-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
Just Drive, She Said

FOX
The Amazing Race has been in a bit of a ratings slump the last couple seasons, but the show is not beyond rescuing. Say, for instance, you made Phil Keoghan a murderous, criminal S.O.B., the front for a shadowy organization that ran the race for the entertainment of powerful interests. Say some of the racers had their family members kidnapped and held hostage to coerce them to compete. Say there were no speed limits, no limits altogether really, and the players were allowed--nay, encouraged, nay, compelled--to kill one another.
More interesting than a "Family Edition," right?
Fox's Drive, which gets a two-hour double-pump debut Sunday night, aims to do with The Amazing Race what Lost did with the concept of Survivor. Actually, that makes this witty, absorbing, if totally implausible entertainment seem both more ambitious and more simplistic than it is. It picks up in Key West, Florida, where various paired-up teams have assembled to start an illegal cross-country road race that's been going on for decades. Some are there willingly, some are not so; all are aware that there is $32 million to be won and, possibly, their lives to be lost.
As on TAR, the pairs break down into telegenic types: the long-lost brothers, the father and teen daughter, the abused mom and baby, the Iraq veteran and his hot girlfriend. The trip is broken down into legs, the endpoint of each of which is delivered in the form of text-message clues. After two-hours, no one has to perform a folk dance or eat three feet of sausage to get past a Roadblock, but we can always hope.
The central figure is Alex (Firefly's Nathan Fillion), a Nebraska man whose wife has been kidnapped. The ransom, he soon learns: he races and wins, or she dies. (An anonymous figure apparently has a lot of money riding on him.) He pairs up, not too willingly, with Corinna (Kristin Lehman), a mystery woman who may have the key to winning the race or may be using or even spying on him. No one knows whom to trust in this mystery: the road is full of moles, other drivers and even coffeehouse waitresses who are really agents of the mysterious race bosses.
There are no otherworldly phenomena as in Lost, but creator Tim Minear (Firefly, Wonderfalls) gives you plenty to puzzle on anyway. Such as: why would anyone spend the zillions it must have taken to create a CIA-level conspiracy in order to run, surveil and keep secret what amounts to a giant human cockfight? It doesn't add up.
On the other hand: giant human cockfight? Awesome! Drive is an audacious, exhilarating enough concept, and its pace and writing snappy enough, to make you want to believe. Some of the characters—the teen daughter, the ex-con—are flatly written, although two hours is barely enough time to flesh out the vast cast. But Fillion, maybe the most underrated leading man in Hollywood, takes command of the screen every time he's on, and as in Firefly, he gets plenty of Han Solo-esque dialogue that builds and breaks the tension at the same time. After coming to the race late (there was a Powerpoint presentation at a hotel before the start), Alex gets in an argument with Corinna about whether they should cheat. "How do you cheat at a game that has no rules?" she asks. Alex: "I don't know! [beat] I missed the orientation."
Unfortunately, I can't comment on one thing that may make or break Drive: the visual effects. Driving scenes can be among the cheesiest on TV, because it's hard to convincingly direct action between two actors who are sitting on a bench seat on set, and to green-screen in scenery that doesn't look fake. The effects weren't complete on the review screener I saw, so I have no idea whether the sometimes-corny-looking scenes I saw were final. In the meantime, I'm along for the ride.
Oh, and for anyone who didn't get the reference, here's some extra credit viewing to hold you until Sunday:
-
1
It seems like some really great shows had their entire run in about the same amount of time that Fox has been pushing this show. I have a feeling that the series will last about as long as I have been seeing those advertisements...
Though this review makes it sound better than I would ever think.
-
2
In the Wonderfalls tradition, April is the time of year Fox launches great shows in order to cancel them.
-
3
Nathan Fillion and a Stan Ridgeway reference: two great tastes that taste delicious together.
-
4
I had a chance to see this on CTV already. Great set-up and a lot of fun. I can't wait to see where they take this.
-
5
already the show becomes unbelievable. Fillian's character has the flash drive --- with (we assume at this point) enough information to blow the race out of the water. Why doesn't he just threaten to use it unless they give his wife back?
Plus, given the voluntary nature of some of the racers, and the (implied) likelihood of being arrested at some point, the idea that somehow this race has remained secret for 27 years is simply absurd.
At least shows like Lost took their time before they made the show laughable...
-
6
Paul--
Who's he going to go to? The police? They're in on it too! The feds? This conspiracy goes all the way up to the vice president, the president--and beyond them. Oh, yes. FAR beyond them.
OK, I'm just spitballing. You're right, of course. The question for me is not whether the show is plausible but whether it's earned its implausibility, which for me it has but on a very provisional basis. This wasn't nearly as good a 2-hour pilot as Lost, but that show started spending its plausibility capital pretty early too; by four episodes in, a paraplegic had been miraculously healed, somebody shot a polar bear, etc.
-
7
As somebody else said...a 37-year secret? Just wait until the first losers call the cops, or the media ... or maybe a disgruntled employee will call.
It's just more quick-cut mindless crap for the masses to distract them from the realities of war. Watch the shiny objects, kiddies.
And if you want a real (and much less violent) show about trying to get to the bottom of a conspiracy, check out "The Prisoner."
-
8
James -- I think the difference between Lost and Drive is that "implausible" is an acceptable means by which suspense can be created (the earliest example I can think of is Murder at the Rue Morgue), but is a bad idea within a show's very premise. (I think the best example of early on absurdity not affecting a show is Twin Peaks.)
The problem with a show like "Drive" is that it requires the audience to wonder "what happens next episode" -- and the minute you begin to "wonder"/consider the possibilites you realize how dumb the show is. Once you are caught up with the characters in the story -- once their individuals stories take precedence over the plausibility of events -- the show has more freedom. (A show like 24 is a perfect example -- the show has become increasingly absurd each season it doesn't matter. We're already part of Jack Bauer's universe -- although I'm personally fascinated by Chloe).
Drive looks to me like a show that starts where Fonzie lands after jumping the shark.
Drive to me looks like the Dukes of Hazard of serial mystery/adventure series --- a whole bunch of car chases looking for a premise.
-
9
I'll have to check it out.
If only because of Nathan Fillion. I love that man and would watch him do anything. However the fact that it is on Fox deters me. I hate Fox. They've managed to screw over almost any show they've made in the last few years.
I feel like giving in if I watch that channel now. However If I do like the show, I'll be afraid Fox will pull another Firefly on me and screw the show over.
-
10
I've watched very little episodic TV in the past ten years. So the parallels or lack of them to shows mentioned here in earlier comments are, well, Lost on me.
My teen son got me to watch the first three hours of Drive with him and I'm surprised to be interested. A parallel I have not seen mentioned here or elsewhere is to Babylon 5. That series likewise contained mysteries that unfolded over time ("no one here is what they seem", "you have a hole in your mind"), and the half-dozen pairings in Drive could be seen as counterparts to the various alien races for storytelling. One of the main characters in B5 even had a missing wife - and it turned out further in that she was involved in the intrigue in a surprising way - I'm not ruling out Tully's spouse throwing the viewers a curve at some point.I'm willing to give the creators of Drive a little more time before I dismiss the show as implausible unbelievable mindless crap or a Dukes of Hazzard clone in search of a premise. Drive might be about a big race the same way B5 was about a big space station, with metaphors everywhere. B5 also took a while to develop the relationships before the story arc really got going. I should add, though, that B5 ultimately disappointed me for a variety of reasons. Chances are that Drive will too - if indeed it's really trying as hard as B5 did.
-
11
I've begun to organize my life around this show. I have my dedicated VHS tape that only gets recorded with episodes of "Drive," and, between episodes, gets stored in a special secret place so no one can tape over it.
I began watching the show because Nathan Fillion stars in it. What can I say? I'm a flan (no, that's not a typo). I would watch that man doing anything, he's so talented. He could sit and pick lint from his bellybutton, and I'm sure I'd be enthralled, because he's Nathan Fillion and a brilliant actor and beautiful and Canadian (yaaay Canada!!).
I continue to watch "Drive" because... well... because Nathan Fillion stars in it. But also because it is a fast-paced, imaginitive, well-written, taut, character-driven drama (kudos to Tim Minear et al) that, as implausible as the premise may seem, never actually steps outside the bounds of reason (except in that nobody ever gets pulled over for speeding or reckless driving- where is the highway patrol while all this is going on?!)
I fear that it won't last. People I talk to are already saying that it'll never make it to the end of this season, let alone be picked up for another. That would be tragically unfair of Fox, to cancel two shows out from under Tim Minear and Nathan Fillion. And if it's cancelled, I'm afraid that there will be no legions of Browncoats this time, no legacy of influence that will allow "Drive" to live beyond its run. But I must keep a good thought--- Fox is, presumably, run by humans, and not malign demigods who amuse themselves by thwarting the just desires of us lesser beings.
Most Popular »
- Sex and 'The Saboteur': Dev Talks Nudity in New Game
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- A Jobs Speech with Elbows
- My Life as a "Science Fetishist"
- Is the Public Option Dead? Plus, Amendments That Might Actually Matter
- Erdogan: Arab Hero?
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- "How Will Dave Ever Make Fun of Sex Scandals Again?"
- The Top 10 Games of 2009
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Tiger Woods Must Face His Fans' Moral Outrage
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go
- Creating Jobs: Can Obama Government Boost Employment?
- That Viral Thing: Facebook's Secret Code
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting













RSS