-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
TV Networks Discover Principles, Or At Least Their PR Departments Do
Over the weekend, CNN's Larry King stepped into the breach of the Paris Hilton debacle and nobly accepted the burden of interviewing the celebutante after her release from prison. No longer will the voice of the underclass be silenced in the media!
More interesting than the Larry King deal, though, was ABC and NBC News' sudden discovery of their deeply held principles, or, at least, of those principles that somebody decided it would be good PR for them to deeply hold. After the two news departments were embarrassed by publicly being caught in a reported bidding war to make Paris slightly richer (along with TIME's sister magazine, People), the deals fell apart and the two networks turned around and refused to interview Paris for free.
To which I can only say, what the--? Who cares if they interview Paris Hilton for free? Sure, it'd probably be a vapid, pointless interview, but no more so than many their morning and nighttime news programs air regularly. The point wasn't the interview subject; it was spending hundreds of thousands for an interview at the same time that both networks are gutting their news staffs.
Really, the networks' sudden refusals to interview Paris were even less principled than their initial attempts to land her. At least then the news departments had the courage of their convictions that Paris would bring them big fat ratings. Their convenient instant conversions just show how ethically rudderless they are: Hey, you know those journalistic standards you people apparently want us to have? Look, we have them now! At least while you're paying attention!
Let's just hope that they get their policies straight before the next time a reality starlet lands in jail. In the meantime, Nicole, keep your nose clean.
-
1
Thankfully, we are breaking those walls with the internet. I applaud your article.
-
2
ABC and NBC dropped the ball here.
If I were ahead of one of these networks, I would have definitely paid for the interview. People were already angry about the bidding. Backing out only makes them seem immoral AND cowardly. I would rather be immoral and brave than immoral and cowardly.
These networks are losing sight of the bigger picture. That picture is the attention this interview would have generated for the networks. Paris Hilton is about the most exciting person on Earth now. Not interviewing her makes these networks seem like punks. The few hundred thousand emails and letters they would have received in protest would have paled in comparison to the attention they could have received.
-
3
Let's just hope Paris doesn't start promoting condom use to avoid unwanted pregnancies. Then she'll be banned on CBS and Fox, too.
Most Popular »
- Sex and 'The Saboteur': Dev Talks Nudity in New Game
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- A Jobs Speech with Elbows
- My Life as a "Science Fetishist"
- Is the Public Option Dead? Plus, Amendments That Might Actually Matter
- Erdogan: Arab Hero?
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- "How Will Dave Ever Make Fun of Sex Scandals Again?"
- The Top 10 Games of 2009
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Tiger Woods Must Face His Fans' Moral Outrage
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go
- Creating Jobs: Can Obama Government Boost Employment?
- That Viral Thing: Facebook's Secret Code
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting













RSS