A blog about television by TIME’s TV critic James Poniewozik.

JFC Watch: Lord, There Went Johnny Appleseed

SPOILER ALERT: Watch John from Cincinnati before you read this, or we're all going to be toast.

jfcfinaleweb.jpg
HBO photo: John P. Johnson

Leave it JFC to conclude--and in the absence of miraculous intervention from Cincinnati, we've got to consider this a series finale--with a wrap-up, what-happened-to-them epilogue that left the show more puzzling, not less. "Earth puts Dickstein on retainer"? "Dr. Smith comes back 20 years younger from Cincinnati"? "Mother of God, Cass-Kai"? Mother of God, what do you mean?

But it's too simplistic to say that the problem with JFC was that it was confusing and that we needed more answers. You can do without a lot of answers if you're invested in the characters. To me the problem--and there was a lot the show did astonishingly well--was that there were too many moments and scenes that would have been transcendent and beautiful if the series had created an emotional bond with the characters rather than just assuming it.

Case in point, Bill's closing monologue to his dead wife: that was moving and lovely, and I didn't need to know who Zippy was or what had become of him to be affected by it. I just needed the script's clear evocation of his loss and his demons and Ed O'Neill's believable evocation of them. On the other hand, take Cissy's response to Mitch ascending to the ceiling. (Take just about anything Cissy has done all season, for that matter.) "Get back down here." Funny, yes. And it makes sense on an intellectual level, even--that her default reaction to anything Mitch does is practical and irritated. But along with that, you still need to feel that you are looking at a human being who has just witnessed another human being floating to the goddamn ceiling. That, we don't get here, whether it's the fault of DeMornay or the script or both. It's the sort of scene that I bet will make perfect sense once I read David Milch's explanation of his thinking on the Inside the Episode guide at HBO. But if you need to explain it, something didn't work.

For all that, this episode actually made me hope against hope for another season. Whether John is from heaven or outer space or neither, what he is first off is a linguistic puzzle, and in the scene with Linc, it was good to see someone addressing him head-on that way, trying to make sense of his language. Once you understand the syntax of his repetitions ("If my words are yours..."), you can understand John ("...you can hear my father"). So Linc was able to figure out some of John's nuances: the "end" was near, because John is the end (whatever that turns out to be). Mitch need to get back in "the game," but Linc needs to get in the game--never having been in in the first place.

Are those answers? Not really. Not hardly. But it was satisfying for me in a way that the series hadn't been, except for John's sermon. Because someone was engaging directly with the questions. And had there been some more of this earlier, and less meandering (albeit poetic meeandering), JFC might have a more serious chance at a second season. (I'd say Lost is the same way--it can get away with avoiding answers to the extent it interests you in the questions.) Granted, most of the people in and around the Yost family are not exactly literary scholars like David Milch, and they're not the types likely to jump in and start deconstructing someone's language immediately, but I don't think it would have been too much hand-holding to give the audience some kind of surrogate like this sooner.

The finale also had John flexing his muscles in a way that we hadn't seen much of earlier -- reading minds, taking a role in the parade, etc. The scene with the used car dealer (who first seemed to resist the sale, then started spouting John-isms and made the deal) was puzzling, but in an interesting way. Is he one of John's cohort? His superior? His "father"? (Notice the familiar way he addressed John, as "Country," and sternly told him "I took you offline.") Or is he just another human, whom John is mentally influencing somehow?

JFC has always hinted that John somehow clouds the thoughts of those around them--he sends Kai into a trance, Sean says he doesn't remember much of "Cincinnati." Like Angels in America (or, in a less ambitious way, Saving Grace), JFC suggests that the proximity of the divine is intoxicating. The problem is, this has made it hard to tell when characters are under the influence of John, and when they're simply behaving implausibly.

Maybe there's no point in Monday-morning quarterbacking now, but in those scenes that worked, there were glimpses of what an amazing series JFC could have been. If critics like me have groused a lot about the show, it's probably from that sense of having been this close to greatness.

For all that, I'd rather watch this show fail than watch most others succeed. There are a lot of qualities that make a great TV show, but one is what I'd call, for lack of a better word, hauntingness--the quality that makes a show's lines and scenes come to mind unbidden for days after you watch. JFC had this in spades. Those glorious point-of-view shots of John and Sean surfing back from Cincinnati will stick with me for a long time. The word "Cincinnati" itself has been transformed for me: who knew back when watching WKRP that it could sound like a biblical city in the clouds?

David Milch and company may not have succeeded, but they were trying to do something far more difficult than anything TV usually attempts--where outside of the soap opera Passions has TV ever done out-and-out magic realism?--and something perhaps impossible. Milch was trying to make a series about the ineffable, about what it would be like for a group of humans to encounter a being trying to explain something that was beyond our experience. In doing so, JFC often failed at the simple artistic job of using the figurative to communicate what can't be expressed literally. In spite of all that, I loved watching them try, and felt lucky that it's possible for someone like Milch to get 10 hours of TV to take a shot at it.

Watching the events unfold on his computer, Duane summed it up for me: "Technically, there's no way we can be seeing what we're seeing." And yet we did. And somehow I'm glad we had the chance.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (13)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    Hey James Poniewozik:

    Be a reporter for us and find out the story of why, exactly, HBO encouraged Milch to abandon Deadwood for JFC. Was it just about money? If so, would HBO like to have a do-over on that decision?

  • 2

    "For all that, I'd rather watch this show fail than watch most others succeed."

    If it were any other show I'd agree with that sentiment, except that it precludes the possibility of any future "Deadwood", and that's a price I'd rather not pay.

  • 3

    You know how those brainy, creative types are. Always fidgeting and anxious.

    Seriously though, are you sure he didn't just want to do something else? Writing the same series for 5 years can get tiresome creatively.

    I say that having 0 experience in the field of creative writing.

  • 4

    I wanted to like this show. In fact, I did kinda like hanging out each week with the Milch/HBO playhouse troupe of actors. But I reacted more enthusiatically to Hey!! That's Wu!! Playing a drug dealer!! than to any of the Big Finish moments. Show added up to less than the sum of its parts.

    Also, Paul Ben-Victor can't play a convincing dumb guy, but it was fun to see him try.

  • 5

    I agree with Howard. James can you find out if we are ever gonna get the Deadwood wrap up movies. If not why not. And if not, that is criminal. And so no JFC 2? The epilogue was silly...I thought it cheapened the ending which I found warm and satisfying (like an intelectual hot pocket)....

    To get niether deadwood movies OR JFC season 2....well that just seems the worst of all possible worlds..
    ..

  • 6

    "where outside of the soap opera Passions has TV ever done out-and-out magic realism?"

    I was surprised by this comment. What about Twin Peaks?

  • 7

    @Owen: You consider Twin Peaks magic realism? It seems to me more a show about supernatural occurrences in a place that turns out to be much more than meets the eye. Obviously there have been lots of supernatural shows--Sunnydale in Buffy is a similar setting. When I think of magic realism, I think of the intrusion of magic or miracles into an otherwise mundane milieu. (For that matter, when I think about it, I'm not sure Passions really fits the bill, either.) But, I'll admit, the term is not so well defined in TV as it is in novels.

  • 8

    I kind of liked this strange little show. However, I was disappointed by the way they wasted the talents of the great Jennifer Grey. Yes, that was Baby from "Dirty Dancing" in bed with Dickstein.

  • 9

    Hmm, you're probably right about Twin Peaks. I think it's Agent Cooper's investigative style that made it magical realism for me. He interacted with the strange happenings around him as normal parts of his investigation -- as if this kind of strangeness was a normal part of the everyday world if you were open enough to it. But that's probably my own interpretation.

    Here's a better one: Northern Exposure.
    And a secondary possiblility: Wonderfalls.

  • 10

    Just watched the finale via on-demand, and have to say that the whole group of ones and zeroes didn't, in the end, form a comprehensive whole.

    NEXT!

  • 11

    JFC was a work of genius, plain and simple. I've devoured every episode of this show several times (live and over and over to friends) and I think that when you really begin to dissect the language of the
    characters speech and their behaviors and the way the conflict. I found the relationships between all of the people and their relating to John absolutely fascinating. I agree that many images and ideas from this show will stay with me for life. DEADWOOD was amazing too. They can't take them both away. HBO pretends to be innovative and risk taking, but if they really cares about being cut of the edge and for the advancement of art and film they would give the audience what it wants. Especially because the Nielsen rating system is the worst possible way of finding out how many people watch something. I don't understand why we can't just have the cable and satellite companies give us the option to let them monitor what channels we watch. If it wasn't mandatory, then at least it would be a better idea of regional viewer numbers. Grrrrrr, just think of Carnivale' and ROME... I know more people have been watching all these shows than they report. GET IT TOGETHER HBO! GIVE US WHAT WE ASK YOU FOR! WE PAY YOU!

  • 12

    Howard, from 08/13- HBO did not pressure Milch to make JFC - they cancelled Deadwood, and told him to make a show about surfers. Read about it at this link.

    http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/08/15/074612.php

  • 13

    I watched every episode and finally saw the finale yesterday. What a frustrating experience. Half-developed characters, half-developed story lines, random scenes, incoherent dialogue. Telling a story is a two-way street. Milch is a self-indulgent storyteller. By the end of the last show I felt disrespected.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Tuned In Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's Tuned In in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
DEBI HEISS, on Ohio's execution of 51-year-old Kenneth Biros; Heiss's sister Tami was a victim of Biros, and the family applauded as the time of death was announced. It was the nation's first execution by a single injection rather than the three-drug process