-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
Stewart at the Oscars: Why? Why Not?
So the Academy Awards have asked Jon Stewart back to host, despite the fact that his last outing, in 2006, drew fewer viewers than Chris Rock before him and Ellen DeGeneres after. Naturally, people are starting to ask why, including LA Weekly's Nikki Finke. (To be specific, she asks: "Has the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences lost its collective mind?")
To which I answer, why not? Maybe the Academy has faced up to the fact that people don't watch the Oscars mainly to watch the host. They watch--or, more and more lately, don't watch--to watch the movies, to see who wins what, to gawk at celebs, to make fun of outfits. to see if they won their Oscar pools, and to get drunk in the company of friends. Sure, people are curious about the host and hope he or she is funny. But I suspect that the entertainment-media biz has gotten over-involved in the parlor game of who should host what, when there's probably no host who can overcome the disintegration of the mass audience, a lack of big-audience nominees with fans invested in whether they win, cynicism about the nomination and lobbying process, or general burnout on an awards show, many of whose winners are foregone conclusions before they unpack the red carpet.
But maybe I've lost my collective mind. (And after all, I liked Stewart as host, better, it seemed, than the celebs in the audience did.) Has the choice of host ever kept you from watching the Oscars? Should they have gone with Colbert?
-
1
I would rather see Stephen Colbert host the show. But since awards shows are boring, I still wouldn't watch it.
-
2
For what it's worth, I get the sense Oscar viewership depends more on how popular the nominated movies are than on who's hosting them. ("Titanic"? "Lord of the Rings"? Decent ratings. "Crash"? "The Departed"? Not so much.) I suspect the size of the audience will depend largely on whether an audience-pleasing blockbuster gets nominated -- which, given the dismal state of this year's blockbusters (mostly threequels), seems unlikely.
-
3
Perhaps Drew Carey should be asked to do it in a Power of 10 or The Price is Right style. You know, actually make the talking picture folks work for that little statue.
I aged into a demographic that could care less about any award show. I just check the internet the next morning if I want to know who won what.
-
4
Nikki Finke is a total nut job.
She hates men, and thus...
Stewart was perfectly fine. The show itself it weighed down with awful direction and thoughtless production. Not Jon's fault.
-
5
Colbert would have been interesting but only if he had done the whole thing in character which would be a near impossible feat even for someone like Colbert. Can you imagine that many hours on stage pretending to be Bill O'Reilly? If he didn't do it in character it would be just like Stewart doing it. So lets just have Stewart. I really liked him last time too.
Most Popular »
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- Why Wells Fargo isn't paying back TARP
- "How Will Dave Ever Make Fun of Sex Scandals Again?"
- Is Harry Reid Burning Out?
- How Will Obama Pay For Stimulus 2.1? (or 3.0, 3.1, whatever you want to call it)
- A Jobs Speech with Elbows
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- The Health Reform Abortion Wars, Part Deux
- Economists Growing More Wary of the Senate Health Bill
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Tiger Woods Must Face His Fans' Moral Outrage
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Creating Jobs: Can Obama Government Boost Employment?
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go
- That Viral Thing: Facebook's Secret Code
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting













RSS