-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
Stewart at the Oscars: Why? Why Not?
So the Academy Awards have asked Jon Stewart back to host, despite the fact that his last outing, in 2006, drew fewer viewers than Chris Rock before him and Ellen DeGeneres after. Naturally, people are starting to ask why, including LA Weekly's Nikki Finke. (To be specific, she asks: "Has the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences lost its collective mind?")
To which I answer, why not? Maybe the Academy has faced up to the fact that people don't watch the Oscars mainly to watch the host. They watch--or, more and more lately, don't watch--to watch the movies, to see who wins what, to gawk at celebs, to make fun of outfits. to see if they won their Oscar pools, and to get drunk in the company of friends. Sure, people are curious about the host and hope he or she is funny. But I suspect that the entertainment-media biz has gotten over-involved in the parlor game of who should host what, when there's probably no host who can overcome the disintegration of the mass audience, a lack of big-audience nominees with fans invested in whether they win, cynicism about the nomination and lobbying process, or general burnout on an awards show, many of whose winners are foregone conclusions before they unpack the red carpet.
But maybe I've lost my collective mind. (And after all, I liked Stewart as host, better, it seemed, than the celebs in the audience did.) Has the choice of host ever kept you from watching the Oscars? Should they have gone with Colbert?
-
1
I would rather see Stephen Colbert host the show. But since awards shows are boring, I still wouldn't watch it.
-
2
For what it's worth, I get the sense Oscar viewership depends more on how popular the nominated movies are than on who's hosting them. ("Titanic"? "Lord of the Rings"? Decent ratings. "Crash"? "The Departed"? Not so much.) I suspect the size of the audience will depend largely on whether an audience-pleasing blockbuster gets nominated -- which, given the dismal state of this year's blockbusters (mostly threequels), seems unlikely.
-
3
Perhaps Drew Carey should be asked to do it in a Power of 10 or The Price is Right style. You know, actually make the talking picture folks work for that little statue.
I aged into a demographic that could care less about any award show. I just check the internet the next morning if I want to know who won what.
-
4
Nikki Finke is a total nut job.
She hates men, and thus...
Stewart was perfectly fine. The show itself it weighed down with awful direction and thoughtless production. Not Jon's fault.
-
5
Colbert would have been interesting but only if he had done the whole thing in character which would be a near impossible feat even for someone like Colbert. Can you imagine that many hours on stage pretending to be Bill O'Reilly? If he didn't do it in character it would be just like Stewart doing it. So lets just have Stewart. I really liked him last time too.
Most Popular »
- Undercover Boss Is Phony and Manipulative. But Don't Hold That Against It.
- NH Poll: Dems Face A Thumpin'
- NBC: There Was Never a Conan O'Brien
- Paul Ryan Won't Run For Prez In 2012
- Today's Health Care Checkup - GOP Plans Under the Spotlight
- CO Gov Poll: Hickenlooper +4
- Love At First Byte: Your Nerdy Valentine's Day Guide
- In The Spotlight, Paul Ryan Faces A Purity Test
- Do You Spend Less than $2,000 Annually on Internet, TV, Cell Phone Service, and Video Games?
- Barack Obama: Then vs. Now
- Asian Carp Battle: Foreign Fish Threaten Great Lakes
- Is the Bible Fact or Fiction? Archaeology's Discoveries
- Spain's Troubled Economy: Fears Over Euro Zone Outlook
- Kennewick Man, Archaeology Find: Who Discovered America?
- Al-Qaeda, Yemen, Wedding: Unlucky Name, Celebration
- Tea-Party Convention: Lessons on Palin and the Movement
- Venezuela: Chavez Protests at Ball Game Over Electricity
- Jim Frederick, Black Hearts in Iraq's Triangle of Death
- Marja: Operation Moshtarak Tests Obama's Afghan War Plan
- Why China Needs The U.S. -- And Vice Versa













RSS