A blog about television by TIME’s TV critic James Poniewozik.

Ken Burns, the Interview: Episode 5--The Past, the Future, and Vietnam

The last in the series. I'm not sure whether this qualifies as a scoop or not, but I don't believe I've seen Burns say that he plans to make a Vietnam documentary elsewhere (not that I've scoured all the clips):

What kind of distance in time do you need from an event to feel comfortable making a documentary about it?

KB: I think what we're engaged in is a kind of temporal triangulation. You need to be 25 or 30 years from an event to make any kind of Judgment. Just look at Vietnam. The example I always use is that if you waited ten years and made a film in 1985, it would have been, America is in a recession, this was our only defeat, the symbol of our decline, Japan was ascendant. In 1995, we'd just won the Gulf War one hand tied behind our back, international coalition, greatest peacetime expansion, Japan is in recession and stagnation. There's another film. In 2005, we're in the lee of 9/11, we're involved in a war in Iraq, people are making parallels to Vietnam. You need to average out these perspectives.

LN: And yet no matter what you do, you'll always reflect the world you're in. It's not to say that there's any one pure truth that you'll arrive at if you wait long enough.

KB: When we made Jazz, we were severely criticized. It was one of the few films based on Jazz that come up to the present. We were severly criticized for taking a kind of impressionistic look at the last 30 years. And we just said we don't have the perspective to say that this person is as great as Duke Ellington or Louis Armstrong or Charlie Parker.

So are you going to do Vietnam?

KB: Yes. Not today, but--there was a point where, with the same vehemence of conviction that I said it after The Civil War, I'd said that we'd never do another war. I felt just within the last few months that we absolutely had to do it. I think we have to wait enough time, several years, until the veterans are, not so much at the onset of death, but at the age where their advancing age will provide them with the kind of perspectives that we've been able to tap into for this film.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (3)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    I don't know when you spoke to him, but at this point, not a scoop. Thanks for posting the extra content, though.

  • 2

    BOYCOTT Ken Burn's THE WAR for not having a full representation of those who fought and died in WWII. Especially since it's produced with public monies. SHAME on CPB/PBS!

  • 3

    The discussion involving the initial ommission of Latinos from The War is valid. However, just what good would come from boycotting a non-commercial documentary? GM is Burn's biggest supporter. I hope you don't drive one of their cars. And if you drive a Japanese car, how do you honor what the veterans fought for. How can you live in a country whose greatest generation was by and large segregationists. This is the line of thinking that these kind of "boycott" comments lead us down.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Tuned In Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's Tuned In in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
JAMIE O'BRIEN, a competitor in the Eddie Aikau surfing competition in Oahu, Hawaii, on surfing the rare 40-foot waves that hit the island this week