-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
The Naked Business Channel
While watching the first morning of Fox Business News today, I looked back at an essay I wrote a few years ago on Fox News, where I wrote that the channel's success owed as much as anything to its attitude and its aesthetics. "Traditional, detached TV news tells you the news is interesting," I wrote. "Fox News tells you the news rocks." Then I noticed the sentence I wrote just before that: "Fox News has done with general news what CNBC did with business news--treated it as ESPN treats sports, with conflict, a little jocularity, NFL-style graphics and rooting interests."
If the Fox News formula is going to work at FBN, in other words, then FBN will have to be even more like CNBC--more excited, effusive and rah-rah--than CNBC is. Is that possible? Judging at least by the first few hours, it's going to try its damnedest.
The first morning of FBN had the feeling of a party way too early in the morning. There was boisterousness: the channel leaned on ESPN-style duos of guys barking at each other about the oil market and the Chinese toy scandals. There was a naked guy: after ringing the opening bell at the NASDAQ this morning, FBN's Alexis Glick went to Times Square to interview The Naked Cowboy, who busks with his guitar wearing nothing but tighty-whiteys and a ten-gallon hat. And there was oversharing: anchor Peter Barnes' voice cracked as Glick rang the NASDAQ bell: "I didn't get choked up until just now," he said. "It's really real." Dude--pull it together. (CNBC, of course, airs the likes of Jim Cramer's Mad Money, but tends to wait until after business hours until it loosens its tie and pops a few blood vessels with Cramer.)
I should note that I'm not a business writer, and thus am not expertly qualified to judge the quality of FBN's information. (For that, visit my bizmeister colleague Justin Fox.) But I'm also not sure that that's the main point, either for TV business news in general, or FBN in particular. FBN has said it's aiming for an audience that's more mass than elite--small investors and the casual viewer. So there was a lot of talk about "the stocks that affect your life" and, regarding the oil market, "What does this mean for you at the pump and for the oil that comes into your house this winter."
The major early difference between CNBC and FBN is tone: FBN has imported Fox's News' earnest stare and 10%-above-normal volume, all calculated to tell you that, slow news day or big news day, something really important is right around the corner. Fox sells excitement--it doesn't really matter the kind--and that attitude carried right over to an interview with an official in the Chicago Mercantile pit, in which the reporter spent more time asking about the "excitement" of working at the market rather than, you know, the market itself.
That approach might work in the long run, and who knows?, it may even produce compelling business news. Glick's interview with The Naked Cowboy (Robert Burck) was a stunt, but it was actually an interesting little piece on how Burck--inspired by the works of Tony Robbins--has parlayed a good bod, a decent voice and the willingness to use them into a thriving merchandising-and-endorsements business.
Glick's optimistic moral for the home viewer: "What it tells you is that, no matter what you think at home, you can make a small business a reality." And The Naked Cowboy played off the segment with a song--indirectly about the American virtues of being shameless and putting on a show--that could well be the Fox theme song:
I'm the Naked Cowboy
And I'm keeping it real for you
I'm the Naked Cowboy
You gotta do what you gotta do
Preach it, brother Burck.
-
26
In 25 posts, I haven't read any calling for the shuttering of FOX News or FOX Business Channel. Does the First Amendment now mean everyone has to like what everyone else says?
Re your topic, James: it wouldn't surprise me to see FBC quickly climb the ratings ladder. If nothing else, FOX News has provided a cable-news haven for viewers vaguely dissatisfied (or totally fed up) with the "liberal media" perception that is typically cast about the rest of the network landscape. Brand loyalty will probably attract viewers who previously felt they had no good choices. Will that automatically make it a reliable source of business journalism? Only if you use "what the people want" as a yardstick.
-
27
"Does the First Amendment now mean everyone has to like what everyone else says?"
Yes.
The First Amendment is what people want as long as there are no hard-core opposing viewpoints. But we all know that the First Amendment is the coolest thing ever. Things Americans say about the government would have these people killed in other countries. If I truly dislike something that somebody else says, I let them say it anyway. I can always punch or kick or headbutt the person if they irritate me too much.
Most Popular »
- Sex and 'The Saboteur': Dev Talks Nudity in New Game
- My Life as a "Science Fetishist"
- Top 10 Shows of 2009: The Best, and the Rest
- Is the Public Option Dead? Plus, Amendments That Might Actually Matter
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- A Jobs Speech with Elbows
- The Top 10 Games of 2009
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- The PlayStation Turns 15, We Reminisce
- That Viral Thing: Facebook's Secret Code
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- College Degrees More Expensive, Worth Less in Job Market
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- India's Friends: Dinner in the U.S., Dessert in Moscow
- Afghanistan War Surge: Might the Taliban Compromise Now?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go













RSS