-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
Strike Watch Meets Lost Watch!
We haven't talked about the Lost Missing Pieces webisodes, have we? Probably because there's not so much to talk about. In the first installment, Jack gets a watch, and another heapin' helpin' of daddy issues. The second is more appealing, simply because we get to meet Neil Frogurt and discover that he something of a d-bag. But if we learned anything--other than that, before Hurley's picnic with the doomed Libby, he packed a bag--I missed it.
But whatever, right? It's November, and it's more Lost, and I will happily lick at whatever dribs and drabs we get, like a dog happily slopping up drips of melted ice cream on the kitchen floor. Hell, I was even more excited about the teensy preview commercials ABC's been running. It's Hurley! In a hatch! With water! And, um, a hatch! Oh, God, give me my show back already!
Which brings us to the newsy aspect of the Missing Pieces bits. You know how the networks were all, "We can't possibly pay writers for Internet video yet! It's too untested a revenue stream! There's no profit in it! Do you know how much it costs to register a domain name at godaddy.com?" Turns out that's not exactly true. According to the New York Times, the Lost writers managed to negotiate a deal with their studio to get paid for the webisodes--$800, hardly a princely sum, but one they, and ABC Studios, are apparently happy enough with.
The article goes on to lay out in greater detail the disagreements between the writers and the studios and the complexities of figuring out an appropriate basis of payment, and certainly it's not a simple, cut-and-dried issue.
But still: eight hundred bucks and a percentage of future transmissions? This is what we're shutting down the 2007-08 TV season for? Yes, yes, I know this is about much more than two-minute webisodes. But complexities or not, it just shows how monumentally stupid this impasse is. I still think that, tactically, the writers' decision to strike as soon as their contract expired was potentially disastrous--like David Carr, I suspect they overestimate their leverage. But ethically, I can completely understand their being ticked off at the studios' poormouthing themselves (all in the interest of keeping as much cash for themselves once the Web does start generating money).
All this, while the moguls fret that they're losing the PR war while the writers are off cutting clever YouTube videos, "succeding in painting them as greedy." Maybe they need to step up their PR game--for instance, by actually not being greedy. Call me crazy, but it just might work.
-
1
I liked "The Watch" very much, the Frogurt one, not so much. When I first heard about the concept, I thought it was a bad idea - lost needs context and time to work as well as it does. But the way they did it - vignettes that take place all over the Lost timeline, reinforces the idea that this show is very much like "Slaughterhouse Five." It's a really good reason for being, other than to give us a Lost fix.
-
2
Two thoughts.
1) The Watch reminds me of the Christopher Walken scene in Pulp Fiction. Except that one had a payoff.
2) About Neil Frogurt: Were the actors on strike? That guy is terrible.
-
3
I just want ABC to release a trailer or even a teaser for the upcoming season. I assume that the network is set on airing what they have in February since they are promoting the webisodes.
I am optimistic about next week's strike negotiations. I might cry if they reach an agreement by mid-December. If they do, Season 4 will be a little behind production but should run as originally intended. How great would that be?
-
4
@Chris Kw. - from your mouth to the studios' ears. Let's give the writers something, fellas, and get back to work. Because otherwise, you're gonna have a legion of pissed off Lost fans.
As for the Lost Webisodes, good character building, and maybe a chance (in Frogurt's case?) to gradually introduce new minor characters to the cast. I wonder if this is an attempt to perhaps avoid the Nikki-Paolo problem - introduce them on the net, get a portion of the audience used to them, and then launch them in the series? Any word James?
(P.S. Not like I minded Nikki and Paolo - in fact, their main episode was, in my opinion, one of the best stand-alone episodes of Lost ever. I mean, if you knew nothing about the mythology of Lost, that episode itself would have been damn cool, in a Hitchcockian, "no they didn't just get buried alive" sense.)
James - any link for the ABC quick promos? I haven't seen any...
-
5
@chaddogg: for the commercial? I haven't seen it online. I saw, I believe, during last week's Pushing Daisies.
As for the webisodes, I doubt they have any aims that great in terms of character introduction / crossover into the regular series. The Lost Experience was much more elaborate, and the crossover into the actual episodes there was limited.
-
6
I know i'm usually Mr Negative around here but one thing i took away from The Watch: Mathew Fox... not much of an actor. I mean seriously.
-
7
Matthew Fox is a great actor. I mean, for reals.
Most Popular »
- Sex and 'The Saboteur': Dev Talks Nudity in New Game
- My Life as a "Science Fetishist"
- Top 10 Shows of 2009: The Best, and the Rest
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- A Jobs Speech with Elbows
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- The Top 10 Games of 2009
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- The PlayStation Turns 15, We Reminisce
- CT Sen Poll: Dodd Trailing All Foes
- That Viral Thing: Facebook's Secret Code
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- College Degrees More Expensive, Worth Less in Job Market
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- India's Friends: Dinner in the U.S., Dessert in Moscow
- Afghanistan War Surge: Might the Taliban Compromise Now?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go













RSS