-
ADD TIME NEWS
- NEWSLETTERS
Dan Rather Goes on Offense
Interesting New York Times piece on the continuing lawsuit by Dan Rather against CBS over its resolution of the 2004 controversy over President Bush's National Guard records, which cost Rather his job. In a nutshell, the network came under conservative fire for a 60 Minutes II report that relied on documents suggesting that Bush had received special favors allowing him to shirk duty with the Texas Air National Guard during the Vietnam war. CBS eventually backed off the report, saying "it could no longer vouch for the authenticity of the documents on which the report had been based."
Rather sued, and according to the Times, his expensive legal inquest has turned up evidence that CBS ran its investigation into Rather's report—which blamed Rather and his producers for rushing a report to air—with an eye toward pleasing conservative critics:
Some of the documents unearthed by his investigation include notes taken at the time by Linda Mason, a vice president of CBS News. According to her notes, one potential panel member, Warren Rudman, a former Republican senator from New Hampshire, was deemed a less-than-ideal candidate over fears by some that he would not “mollify the right.”
Meanwhile, Mr. Thornburgh, who served as attorney general for both Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush, was named a panelist by CBS, but only after a CBS lobbyist “did some other testing,” in which she was told, according to Ms. Mason's notes, “T comes back with high marks from G.O.P.”
Another memorandum turned over to Mr. Rather's lawyers by CBS was a long typed list of conservative commentators apparently receiving some preliminary consideration as panel members, including Rush Limbaugh, Matt Drudge, Ann Coulter and Pat Buchanan. At the bottom of that list, someone had scribbled “Roger Ailes,” the founder of Fox News.
The case is likely to go on trial early next year, says the Times. But it would be ironic if it turned out that, in accusing Rather and others of running a shoddy investigation gathering evidence to fit a predetermined outcome, CBS was, well, running a shoddy investigation gathering evidence to fit a predetermined outcome.
-
the meta-meta story here is that the Times story is basically a rip-off of the work being done by felix gillette over at the New York Observer. Gillette did a piece detailing the GOP connections back on November 6th, based on the same court documents -- and his subsequent reporting has been even more relevatory. This is especially latest piece, in which it becomes clear that the whole Thornburgh/Boccardi think was just a pantomime... ("our instruction to leave the organism alive after the cancer is removed.”)
http://www.observer.com/2008/media/rather-lawyers-charge-heyward-hondled-troopergate-panelin other words, there is nothing "new" in the Times piece -- and the story here is about how the facts in the Times story have been available for over 10 days, but only now that the story is being reported by The Times are those facts considered important enough for the rest of the media to examine....
Most Popular »
- Embracing the Simple Life, Starting With Your Clothes
- Playing Good Cop/Bad Cop with Sotomayor?
- Oh NO! He's CRASHING!
- The (Positive, Enthusiastic, Subsidized) Critics of the Future?
- The CIA: What Was It Up To?
- McCain: "Retract Immediately"
- Cheney Slaps Back
- Behold the power of the potato
- Palin In The Post
- Another Big, Unanswered Question About Events in Urumqi
- The CIA's Secret Program: Why Wasn't Panetta told?
- Box-Office Weekend: BrÜno a One-Day Wonder?
- Harry Potter, Round 6: Darker, Richer and All Grown Up
- Yes, I Suck: Self-Help Through Negative Thinking
- Why Are Southerners So Fat?
- Study: Help for Chronic Hair Pullers?
- Can Turmeric Relieve Pain? One Doctor's Opinion
- The Man Who Tamed the Tamil Tigers
- 7 Clues To Understanding Dick Cheney
- Housing Woes: Price Reductions Are Proliferating












RSS