-
ADD TIME NEWS
- MOBILE APPS
- NEWSLETTERS
Lipstick Jungle Is Not Cancelled, But They're Working on It
Bill Carter in the New York Times reports that, contrary to the word flying around last week, Lipstick Jungle is not cancelled after all. Though the between-the-lines read of his report is not that encouraging:
[NBC co-chair Ben] Silverman noted that it does not repeat well at all, which makes it a risky long-term investment if its first-run ratings are not stronger than they have been so far.
Carter also alludes to a strong show of fan support, which seems to allude to reports that fans of the show have been sending NBC tubes of lipstick in protest. This is a long-running TV tradition—remember the Tabasco sauce for Roswell?—but the one example in recent memory of such a fan protest getting results (peanuts for Jericho) resulted in the show returning to lower ratings yet and being cancelled again.
I can't wait until a network kills a cult-hit show about a blacksmith, and the rabid fans will be forced to send in anvils.
-
1
Another good example is Family Guy's return from demise into a pop culture phenomenon, even beating out the new episodes of the Simpsons. My only question is: Where were all the fans for Arrested Development? We should have banded together and sent in frozen bananas, or a sleeve full of pennies, or a prosthetic hand, or a loose seal...the list can go on.
-
2
Sending the networks stuff is American guilt at not supporting the Post Office, FedEx, or UPS enough. We're stimulating the mail economy folks!
-
I remember all the online petitions for Arrested Development, but yeah sending frozen bananas would have been way funnier, although probably wouldn't have been any more successful. -
3
@alekshy: Actually, I thought of mentioning Family Guy -- the salient difference for which was, fans didn't save it by sending trinkets, they saved it by buying the DVDs.
-
4
It's just the other side of the lose-lose nature of canceling shows with episodes still to air (in tight economic times).
If you cancel a show and stop airing episodes, you eat the cost of production on those unaired episodes.
If you cancel a show and air them all, you risk the likelihood that advertisers won't want to spend money on ad slots when who knows if anyone will continue to watch (until the replacement starts airing).
So you get this tactic: Cancel a show, but pretend like you haven't / are "still evaluating" (at least until the ad spots are sold). Not that anyone is buying it, but hey, the execs think they're pulling a fast one...
-
5
ahh man. every time I get into a show it gets canceled. This is exactly why I hate to start liking shows in their first season. I thought I was safe with this one.
Most Popular »
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- "How Will Dave Ever Make Fun of Sex Scandals Again?"
- CNN Poll: Man Made Global Warming Takes a Hit
- Is Harry Reid Burning Out?
- How Will Obama Pay For Stimulus 2.1? (or 3.0, 3.1, whatever you want to call it)
- Why Wells Fargo isn't paying back TARP
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- The Health Reform Abortion Wars, Part Deux
- Economists Growing More Wary of the Senate Health Bill
- Quinnipiac: Obama Gets Bump on Afghanistan
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Tiger Woods Must Face His Fans' Moral Outrage
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- Creating Jobs: Can Obama Government Boost Employment?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- U.S. Doesn't Know Where bin Laden Is; Time to Let Go
- Suspect Headley: Pakistani Terrorist Group Going Global?
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting














RSS