Monday, December 1, 2008 at 10:34 am
Armed Conflicts (of Interest)
If you have more time on your hands than I do this morning, I recommend David Barstow's New York Times opus about retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey and how, as an omnipresent military analyst for NBC News, he has advocated military policies that serve the interests of defense contractors—one of whom pays him to do just that, though his conflict goes undisclosed on-air.
An earlier Barstow report on TV defense analysts and their conflicts was just a subject on The IFC Media Report, which went on to question why TV news in particular did not follow up on the New York Times expose. (After all, usually the front page of the Times ends up being a blueprint for that day's cable and network newscasts.) So eyes are already trained to see whether there will be any TV coverage of the follow-up.
I can't do Barstow's article justice in a short space, but it's worth noting how, besides the financial conflicts of military analysts, money plays a role on the other side of the transaction too. "Military analysts," after all, proliferate across TV largely because—as with any other talking head—putting them on the air to hold forth is cheaper than on-the-spot reporting, especially when it comes to wars and international incidents.
In related TV-networks-cheaping-out-on-news news, by the way, Aaron Barnhart at TV Barn has a beautiful video critique of how MSNBC bailed on reporting the terrorist attack in Mumbai over the weekend. But fear not: they have municipal parking violations covered!
1 Comment or Trackback to “Armed Conflicts (of Interest)”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
- Aaron Barnhart’s TV Barn
- About Last Night
- Alan Sepinwall
- Arts & Letters Daily
- BuzzMachine
- Defamer
- Heather Havrilesky
- James Wolcott
- Matt Zoller Seitz
- Maureen Ryan
- Melanie McFarland
- Metafilter
- Peter Ames Carlin
- Popwatch
- Romenesko
- Television Without Pity
- Tim Goodman
- TV Guide blogs
- TV Newser
- TV Tattle
- Undercover Black Man
- Virginia Heffernan
- Zap2It’s TV Blog
- The Making of America: The Legacy of F.D.R.
- Video: March of TIME - FDR in 1936
- Video: The Iconic Photo of FDR
- The Populism of the FDR Era
- President Bill Clinton on FDR
- Photographing FDR
- FDR's Lessons for Obama
- The Bigger Issue Behind North Korea's Missile Launch
- Why Sarah Palin Quit
- Honduras Braces for a Protracted Fight
- Inside Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch
- U.S. Marines Open a New Offensive in Afghanistan
- The History of the Bikini
- Photos: India's Contraband Wildlife
- Photos: A Madoff Family Album
- Michael Jackson: The Last Photos
- Public Enemy: The Extremely Brief and Violent Life of John Dillinger
- Photos: Sacha Baron Cohen's Outrageous BrÜno Promotions
- The World's Ugliest Dog Show
- Party On with the G-8!
Monday, December 1, 2008 at 3:02 pm
Although the entire article is disturbing, I don't know which is worse: the lack of disclosure when influencing government spending or network news not doing its job. Of course, I assume that Congress and Patreus know "how things are done" and can read the writing on the walls, whereas the American public not so much, but still... With the amount of money being thrown around, you'd hope for a bit of outrage.