A blog about television by TIME’s TV critic James Poniewozik.

ABC Moves to White House for Health-Care-a-Thon

I spent a good part of the first half of the week working on a column for the print TIME, which, because some country can't figure out how to properly hold/rig an election, ended up being held for lack-of-space reasons. Oh, death of print—why can't you come sooner! 

Part of the column dealt with ABC News' plan next Wednesday to essentially devote its entire news day, from Good Morning America through Nightline, to President Obama's health-care plan. The centerpiece of the coverage will be a primetime townhall with the President, moderated by Diane Sawyer and Charles Gibson; World News Tonight will also be anchored from the White House. 

I do hope they Bo sit behind the anchor desk! Because he is a good doggie! Yes he is! Oh, yes he is!

The Republican National Committee issued a complaint that the arrangement amounts to free advertising for Obama: "In the absence of opposition, I am concerned this event will become a glorified infomercial to promote the Democrat agenda. If that is the case, this primetime infomercial should be paid for out of the DNC coffers."

I'm going to wait and see how the actual coverage looks, but I don't think the move is biased on the face of it, for a few reasons.

(1) This is at least as much a favor to ABC, one of whose major motives must be ratings, given the performance of NBC's Inside the White House special.

[Update: In the comments, lostepic makes a good point—"As for ABC holding the special, I would appreciate it if other news organizations, all MSNBC, NBC, CBS, FOXNEWS, CNN, etc..., were able to air at least the town hall special." I agree, in the civic sense—the wider the discussion, the better. On the other hand, the last time Obama held a primetime press conference and requested time from all the broadcast networks, the result was grumbling that the President was costing them money and going on TV too much. Even with commercial time, a town hall on all networks would become a commodity and would likely mean lower ratings for any individual network. The paradox, I guess, is that when Obama agrees to go on one network, it's an exclusive; when available to all of them, it becomes an imposition.]

(2) This isn't an election, where America is choosing between two candidates. We don't have two presidents offering competing agendas. And regardless the merits of the RNC's argument that "President Obama does not hold a monopoly on health care reform ideas," the reality is that his party holds the White House and effective control of Congress. The political debate right now is about the Obama/Dem plans—yea, nay, or modify—and it isn't ABC's obligation to pretend the balance of power is otherwise. 

(3) The test of the news special will be how well and skeptically ABC can examine Obama's proposals, hold them to questioning and challenge them with alternatives and critiques. Given the arrangement with the White House and the criticism, the onus will be on them to be especially tough. (Which is probably the major goal of the RNC's complaint—and good for the GOP for applying the pressure; that's their job.) Given that Charles Gibson co-moderated what was widely regarded, or castigated, as the toughest Presidential debate on Obama, I don't see why so many people would assume he would suddenly roll over. 

In any case, I'll judge after I watch. I'm skeptical that this draws as many eyeballs as Brian Williams eating a hamburger with POTUS. But maybe they'll get lucky and the President will kill something again.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (11)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    Great post!
    .
    On a side note, it continues to tee me off to no end when rightwingers say "the Democrat _____". Its "Democratic" and it just makes me see red every time I hear some jacka$$ smugly saying "democrat" this or that. Right wing conspiracy in action.

  • 2

    Love this idea. I feel confident that ABC News will devote coverage to all sides of the issue, if only to fill time. That would be one LONG pep rally without a little conflict. But the GOP's main strategy this summer seems to be sulking and complaining about getting steamrolled rather than offering alternative solutions. Wait, it won't cut into WIPEOUT will it? If so, then nevermind.

  • 3

    @shara: ‘sarcastic remark - riiiggghhht.' 1. Democrat, in the context you're mentioning, is a political party and an advocate of democracy. Democratic is a political idea dealing with the nature of democracy and at times dealing with the Democratic Party. Both terms in their own context can mean either advocating democracy or the political party, both terms work. 2. Both sides partake in the same hashing of "Us verses Them".
    I also share in your "displeasure" of people who are smug in their standing whether political, social or spiritual. If change is going to happen we should be able to have a discussion with out being offended or with the intent of offending. Just thought I would let you know that this moderate republican doesn't think that the Republican party has all the answers, they certainly don't hence I am a centrist.
    As for the all-day-special, if we are truly going to have health care reform it needs to be properly constructed and lay out for the public to understand without fine print.
    .
    As for ABC holding the special, I would appreciate it if other news organizations, all MSNBC, NBC, CBS, FOXNEWS, CNN, etc..., were able to air at least the town hall special. It that this isn't an election, however, there are some other ideas in congress as to the proper method in dealing with national health care reform, and the alternative methods provided afterward, and with media coverage so we can know about it, would be appreciated.
    .
    I have no qualms with the President having another town hall or press conference to lay out his proposal. That is apart of the Presidents duties is presenting and submitting to Congress policies and legislation.
    .
    I too will wait to make a judgment on ABC's ability to not sugar coat any questions and to challenge the Presidents proposal in an appropriate manner but at the same time not accepting it as gold.

  • 4

    @lostepic: Shara was clearly talking about the people misusing the word. If you've heard any right-wing radio or the people that follow them you hear the phrase used incorrectly. It's not the Democrat Party, it's the Democratic party. A member of the party is a Democrat. It's used incorrectly on purpose, for a reason I can't fathom. It does get under my skin, so maybe that's the purpose... or maybe it's just another celebration of ignorance.

  • 5

    @lostepic- to follow up on the points by Rorschach and Shara Says- Democrats prefer the name 'Democratic Party'. I would think a minimum effort at good-faith engagement would be to refer to your political opponent by their preferred name, rather than something that grates on their ears. The RNC (not to be confused with Republicans in general) either fails to grasp this fact, or else has very little interest in making good-faith efforts at dialogue.

  • 6

    [...] ethical issues, NBC seems to have started a trend. ABC in the United States intends to air a “national conversation” on health care, but has inconspicuously denied opponents of the administration’s [...]

  • 8

    Thanks, shara. I had always credited it to Limbaugh. I should have known it was Gingrich.

  • 9

    @shara: Yeah, the use of "Democrat party/policies/congress" by the Republican party comes across as such an immature prank. I have no idea what the objective of this strategy is beyond ticking off the opposite party. They certainly wouldn't convince Independents by mangling the name of the other party.

    Chris Matthews chided a Republican Congressman for this sometime back:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR7MphuhEwc
    .
    With regards to the ABC airing, the health care reform is a major legislation being currently debated. If they cover it properly it would be immensely useful. Another interesting video on the critics of this airing:
    http://www.dailykostv.com/w/001852/

  • 10

    @shara, @Rorschach, @anon76: Thank you for the insight, well made points. I was always under the impression that the definitions and proper use of the terms that I stated was correct. I being a Republican 100% agree with you when public figures that supposedly represent Republican Party or any Republican for that matter talk out of their you know what. Thats why I am a moderate/center Republican, in which case I should just start calling myself an Independent because there is so much crap that the actual Party itself does I dont agree with

  • 11

    lostepic: You might as well come clean and admit you are a liberal, nothing to be ashamed of... you are proof Gen. Powell's attempt to appease folks like you is failing miserably. That is, unless he is really a Democrat plant on a mission of great political damage to the Republicans. (Oh, yeah, I used "Democrat" properly there.) Moderates remind me of tennis balls. For a brief moment they are in the "center" as they sail over the net, just to get bashed by a racket on the left, then one on the right. Find yourself some core values and become a tennis racket either on the left or the right. It will help your life become much less confusing even if you're wrong.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Tuned In Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's Tuned In in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
ESFANDIAR RAHIM-MASHAIE, head of staff for Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, after five British sailors were detained for drifting into Iranian waters

Stay Connected with TIME.com