A blog about television by TIME’s TV critic James Poniewozik.

MTV to Show Us Its Skins

MTV announced today that it's making its own version of the British teen dramedy Skins, which has been running here on BBC America. I'm both excited and apprehensive. A few thoughts:

* I had hoped a while back, in my recently-neglected Unwanted Programming Advice feature, that HBO or Showtime would make a teen drama of their own, uninhibited by either network squeamishness or pressure to dumb it down. At the time, I noted, Skins was being shopped around for an American remake, so that was a good possibility: the show, at turns raunchily funny and brutally serious, would be the kind of thing a pay cabler could do well without pressure.

* Well, HBO and Showtime didn't take my advice, but I'm at least glad it wasn't a broadcast network. MTV has possibilities, but it also makes me nervous—and no, not because I assume anything MTV makes is automatically stupid. It's made excellent scripted shows in the past, but its strengths have been animation (Beavis and Butt-Head, Daria, Clone High) rather than live-action (Undressed). I'll have to hope that MTV doesn't cheap out or try to make its characters too cool.

* One thing that made the British Skins so unusual is that it had writers not much older than the characters, and used a roster of unknown talent. MTV, to try to re-create the magic, says it will also hired unknown teens to write and act. I hope it works, though that seems a little like trying to force lightning to strike twice. (If they do go this route, I suspect that the result will be better if the show has wide freedom to depart from the original—why bother finding fresh talent just to force them to copy an original like Hollywood hacks?)

* That said, with the caveat that remakes are always tricky, I think Skins is the kind of show that's a good candidate to remake. Namely, because it was good but not perfect, and so there isn't the anxiety of unmatchable expectations. (I've watched only the first 2 seasons; tell me if you think differently of season 3.) Given the chance to reinvent itself, the freedom to handle its sexual content and the talent to make it honest and perceptive rather than sensational and slick, it could be a good show. I'm not sure MTV is the first network I'd have picked to do it, but I'm glad someone is trying. Any Skins fans disagree?

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (3)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    "I've watched only the first 2 seasons; tell me if you think differently of season 3."

    I think differently, although it doesn't really change your post: it was similarly inconsistent to the first two seasons, just with the bad outweighing the good as opposed to the other way around.

    My fear with a remake of Skins is that while there are unmatchable expectations, what makes the show great to me is when it dials back on the scandal and zeroes in on characters in a really close, really dramatic fashion. I don't think it was just a question of having unknown actors/writers, I think it was a very clear mission statement, and one that doesn't necessarily jive with what I would call the MTV aesthetic.

    This isn't to say that it is impossible for this to exist in the context of a remake, but rather that it seems like the thing most likely to get lost in translation.

  • 2

    It's interesting that they are going with young unknowns for writing and acting. It's the only reason I might give it a chance, because unlike you JP I will pre-judge an MTV show.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Tuned In Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's Tuned In in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
ZEITUNI ONYANGO, President Obama's aunt, lamenting that she is no longer in contact with her nephew and his family

Stay Connected with TIME.com