A blog about television by TIME’s TV critic James Poniewozik.

Mad Men Watch: What's in a Name?

AMC

AMC

SPOILER ALERT: Before you read this post, put down that vase and watch last night's Mad Men.

Well! Feels better to let all of that out, doesn't it!

What was so amazing about that long, draining, overdue confrontation between Don and Betty Draper was that it was absolutely absorbing even though it consisted--on the surface--of Don's revealing information we had known all along: his family history, his parents, the war, his ex-wife (or "ex-wife"), his brother. The real suspense was in wondering whether Don would find an out again, and whether he would find some way to change, or withhold, some information he was too uncomfortable to lay bare. And the shock was in seeing him actually tell all, right down to his culpability for Adam's death.

At least, it consisted on the surface of information we already knew. What we got in the telling, though, were things we had always wondered: How would Betty respond to this information? What does Betty assume about his past? How does Don see the facts of his life, which we've scarcely heard him discuss out loud with anyone save for bits and pieces? (There was his revelation about his mother to Rachel Menken, for instance, or, more tangentially, little moments like his casual remark here that he's eaten horsemeat, presumably under much less genial circumstances than Annabelle Mathis.)

In the process, we see an astonishing reversal of the relationship between Don and Betty: her commanding and in control, him diminished and cornered. (The opening moments, where Don walks into his children's arms like the snapping jaws of a trap, were brilliant.) And if Mad Men was annoyed about monopolizing merely the writing and best-drama awards at the Emmys, it may now have a couple of acting submissions to fix that problem for them. Jon Hamm has spent almost three seasons building an edifice of confidence and seamless artifice; here he had the chance to show it sliding off Don Draper like mud sliding down a mountain face. He's cornered and afraid; he swallows hard and avoid Betty's gaze, like a guilty child.

As for Betty, her refusal to confront Don last episode--bolstered by her lawyer's advice to look the other way for her "good provider"--turned out to have been a head fake. When she pointedly asked Don for cash on the way out the door to Philadelphia, I initially read it as her passive-aggressive, childish way of hoping that he would come clean to her without her having to act; but looking at it a second time, it seemed more like her giving him one last chance.

I could go over their long talk--maybe the most harrowing spousal showdown since The Sopranos' "Whitecaps"--but much of it speaks for itself, and honestly, I was so gripped by it the first time through that I largely stopped taking notes. The false man who was Don Draper melted away like candlewax; Betty, meanwhile, grew before our eyes, moving through stages from anger to stoicism to contempt (I see how you are with money; you don't understand it") to, finally, sympathy--or maybe pity. She takes command of the interrogation, but at the same time, you can see her wishing he would give her some decent reason to accept him.

It's the last scene between Don and Betty that's most intriguing. With everything on the table between them, is their marriage broken, or is it now stronger? With all Don's deceptions admitted, she seems to look at him, if not more warmly, at least more comfortably. With her husband finally having told her who he is, has she gotten what she wanted? Is she now a more equal partner in their marriage, rather than a pretty thing who's kept on a need-to-know basis?

And Don--having had to give up his entire strategy for being in the world, will he be lost, or can he grow comfortable actually being known by his wife? Will being brought down make him more fully a person? Will it change him? As far as his infidelities are concerned, that's no certain thing: when Suzanne asks if she's going to see him anymore, he replies, "Not right now."

As with so many things on this show, to see the challenge Don has before him in life, look to the challenge he has at work. Mad Men has from the beginning analogized Don to the products that he is selling at work. Last night, he was dead meat. And now Don Draper has to rebrand himself. As he tells Annabelle:

"Any agency that does not change the name is stealing your money. The product is good, it's high-quality, dogs love it, but the name has been poisoned."

"That name got us where we are. Do you think that was just luck?"

"I'm not saying a new name is easy to find. And we will give you a lot of options. But it's a label on a can. And it will be true, because it will promise the quality of the product that's inside."

You don't need a Ph.D. in literature to decode that this is how Don has regarded his own name; even as Betty is breaking him down, he keeps protesting that he doesn't see what difference his story makes. He's still the same man!

He's the same man, though, now with a name that's been poisoned, and without the option of coming up with a catchy new one again. His job as an ad man has always been, as they say, to get the dogs to eat the dog food, but his own brand is going to be a trickier problem. With no other option, he must now actually attend to the quality of the product that's inside.

In other news, Joan bashed Greg over the head with a vase!--I mean, that right there would put this in the pantheon of top Mad Men episodes. This episode, pretty clearly, was constructed as a triptych of powerful women: Annabelle trying to reassert her power with Roger, Betty finally discovering her power in her marriage--and, here, Joan deciding to stop coddling whiny Greg and show him where the power lies in their marriage.

It's odd, because a sense of threat has always hung over the scenes between Greg and Joan since we saw him rape her at the Sterling Cooper offices. But beyond that scene--a pathetic act to assert his dominance against humiliation--we've since seen him largely attentive to, and at times even cowed by Joan, who now has the job of propping him up and creating the illusion that he's a grown-up. (It's no coincidence that, as she coaches him for his psychiatry interview, she actually seems like a therapist leading a session--yet another way in which Mad Men has shown us the ways Joan could have achieved if she had had the same opportunities as the often-inferior men around her.)

And so when Joan clocked hubby over the head--pushed by his self-pitying claim that she doesn't know what it's like to want something and not get it--we may have briefly feared that he'd get violent. But in retrospect it made much more sense that he'd react, in character, like a punished puppy, bringing flowers and apologizing. And--like a puppy wanting so badly to make his mistress happy and dropping some awful dead thing on the front porch--he comes home beaming with the news that he's joining the army.

The commenters who suggested that "Guy Walks Into an Advertising Agency" (which ended with Joan applying a tourniquet and getting spattered in blood) foreshadowed a character we know being affected by Vietnam are looking more and more right. I've got to wonder where this is going from here, though. Maybe a spinoff? Anyone for "Mad Men: China Beach"?

And speaking of war, time for the hail of bullets:

* Who's giving odds that Annabelle becomes a bidder for Sterling Cooper?

* Incidentally, take it from my colleague Joel Stein: horsemeat is scrumptious, though "closer to beef than venison."

* "You obviously wanted me to know this or you wouldn't have left your keys. You wouldn't have left all of this in my house." Exactly what I was thinking we she found the stash--or, more to the point, if Don really wanted to let go of his past, why would he have hung on to its reminders? So what about it--is Betty right?

* I referenced "Whitecaps" above, but it shows the difference between Mad Men and The Sopranos that Betty and Don's showdown is not a blow-up but an interrogation. When Don goes into the kitchen for "a drink"--as she rightly notes, his escape instinct is kicking in--she takes control of the situation like a cop ("You don't get to ask any questions!"): She will get the drink, and he is going to sit down and talk. No one gets slammed against a wall, but the blows land just as hard.

* One very slight quibble: the last line--"And who are you supposed to be?"--was probably irresistible, but I wish they'd gone for something less obvious. I realize others will probably love it, though.

* Whatever comes of Annabelle's return to Roger's life, it's interesting to see him paired with a woman who gives as good as she gets, and their banter, with its allusions to his broken-hearted past, was something: "That woman [in Casablanca] got on the plane with a man who was going to end WWII, not run her father's dog-food company."

* Poor Suzanne. The question now: is Don really done with her? Is she really done with him? Early in the episode, she lets on that she's been the other woman before: "I just wanted more than I thought I would want. But it'll pass. Actually I know that it will."

* I don't know that Canadian Club would particularly want a product placement in this kind of scene, but I did notice that, at the Draper's dinner table, the label was turned full-on to the camera. At least Don Draper managed to sell something that night.

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (11)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    While we don't have Sal, we're welcoming Betty and Joan back into the fold. HOUSE CATS NO LONGER! And may I just take a moment to say that Jon Hamm and January Jones performed one of the best scenes in television in a long time. Hamm - from whom we've seen next to no emotion over the course of the show - was able to break down and not make it appear cheesy. If anything, I felt embarrassed - like seeing your dad cry for the first time. And Jones' awkwardly placed hand on his shoulder - realizing she now holds the reins, but isn't quite sure yet what to do with them. In that same vein - I didn't see Betty's telling Don she'd get him a drink as her asserting her control of the situation, I saw it more as her telling herself she had to, because Don was in no state to do so. For me, this was more of a self-empowering/self-realization moment for Betty, rather than a "I'm in charge now!" moment.

    Re the spinoff: I don't see spinoff (although I would LOVE IT), however I do see a possibility wherein the show becomes less Sterling-Cooper -centric. The firm is for sale - and there's bound to be turnover (Campbell). Joan may be out - but she's staying in New York for her hubby's residency. Don't get me wrong - an ad agency would still be the focus, but perhaps not Sterling-Cooper, and perhaps not as big of a focus as it was before.

    For some reason, I can't see the show coming back in 1964. I just get a feeling it's going to skip a few years this time. Although I always think that, and it never does.

    There was yet another ominous allusion to Don's health in this episode: "They cause cancer." -awkward turn to watch Don lighting up a cigarette. Should we be expecting a heart-attack cliff hanger in a few weeks?

    I know I had so many more questions I wanted to ask here, but as soon as Joan hit the rapist over the head with a vase...my mind went blank, and my inner voice just went "OH NO SHE DI'NT!"

  • 2

    This episode was fantastic, and I think you would agree that Peggy has become one of the funniest characters (almost as much as Roger) on the show.

    Her line, that went along the lines of, "I can't stop it, it's happening right now!" made me laugh for a good five minutes.

  • 3

    I was a little shocked when Joan gave Greg what he deserved. But it's almost as him Matthew Weiner asked the question, "What do the viewers want Joan to do to him to shut him up?"

    I even said "Holy Sh--" at the same moment as Greg

    The scenes between Don and Betty were fantastic. Now that Don is being honest maybe Betty can begin to work on her parenting skills.

  • 4

    I'm not sure Don didn't really just prove himself to be the consummate ad man last night.

    We've seen Don weave his magic off the cuff before. It really felt to me like he may well have been doing the same thing last night, almost instinctually, when he was confronted by Betty. He gave the "customer" exactly what she needed. He floated the "King of the castle" machismo, but dropped it like a hot potato the minute it didn't fly. Then we got the "I need a drink", the thousand yard stare out the window, the fumbled cigarette and suddenly Betty was pouring his drink for him and the verbal judo began, "Where do you want me to start?"

    Before it's over Betty is sitting next to him on the bed and telling Don how sorry she is about his brother.

    Don pulls this off all while he has his mistress sitting outside in his car. By the next night Betty isn't exactly lovey dovey, but she is feeding him sandwiches and they're trooping off as a family to go trick or treating.

    That's some Clio award level damage control.

    Did Don want to be caught out? Maybe. But what a lot of people who didn't live through that time may not realize, is that the whole "my desk" thing really was a powerful concept in a lot of suburban homes. The place where 'men's work' was done and the little lady of the house had absolutely no business going or bothering her pretty little head about. It was the next best thing to a safety deposit box in the minds of a lot of men. But then Betty never really was the meek little house cat so many seem to see her as. She's always been the pampered princess who could make life quite unpleasant when she wasn't happy, whether you were spouse or one of her children.

    She's kicked Don out of the house once, flirted with infidelity twice, engaged in it once already and is dancing with that devil yet again even now. Betty is a long way from being a slouch when it comes to putting the aggressive in passive aggressive.

  • 5

    Hate to burst your bubble, but Annabelle's character is done. I think she was just a vehicle to show Roger that he actual loves Joan. Look at the difference with how he treats her from the office to the dinner? What happened in-between? He talked to Joan. When he says that Annabelle wasn't the one, I think he's referring to Joan. Even if I am totally wrong about the Joan thing, we aren't seeing Annabelle again.

    • 5.1

      I agree that Joan is "the one." Of course, I wasn't convinced last week that Betty understood that Don had assumed another man's identity. But, as someone here or in Mo Ryan's comments noted, she did go to Bryn Mawr--it's easy to let her poor parenting and life skills distract you from her intelligence.

      P.S. Sign me up for Mad Men/China Beach Watch. I LOVED China Beach!

    • 5.2

      I agree that was the first and last time that we'll see Annabelle. The last scene with them in the staff room seemed pretty definitive.

      However, if we're making predictions for the new owner of Sterling Cooper, I'd put my money on Duck's company. Everything feels to be moving in that direction: Peggy, Pete, and finally Don's shiny new contract. That was the thing (or the lack of it) that won Don his battle with Duck last season. If Duck comes back now in a managerial capacity Don has no recourse. He could leave but there's that pesky non-compete clause.

  • 6

    One of the many great little touches John Hamm put into last night's performance was the way he carried the box of photos around, cradling it reverently, as if the real remains of his family were in there. He's not just holding onto his past, he's caring for it. Maybe he's doing this for Adam, but then why not keep just one or two photos? A shoebox in a drawer can't go undetected forever, no matter how well guarded in Daddy's chambers. (Another nice moment: the morning after, when he scooped up the photos to hide them in the box, and then put them back down, like he's practicing putting his cards on the table for the first time.)

  • 7

    At last, Betty knows the truth about Don. Well, most of the truth. He has failed to tell her that he had deliberately switched dog tags with the real Draper. And there is the matter of Suzanne Farrell.

    Will this save their marriage? I rather doubt it. I don't know. Perhaps Weiner will surprise us.

    I'm probably the only one who didn't cheer when Joan smashed the vase on Greg's head. I dislike him, but I believe that she had reacted in a childish and violent manner. She had finally lowered herself to Greg's level. I would have been more impressed if she had left him or filed for divorce.

  • 8

    Also, if I remember correctly, Adam is the one who gave him the box, back in Season 1. He mailed the box to Don, I think after he committed suicide, and Pete opened it. So he may have kept it out of guilt for what he did to Adam. Also, there was some question as to why he had his old dog tags if they were with the body of the real Don Draper, but my guess is that Adam had them and included them in the box. I believe the tradition is to give the dog tags to the surviving kin, and Adam would be the last blood relation that Dick had.

  • 9

    [...] Mad Men Watch: What’s in a Name? SPOILER ALERT: Before you read this post, put down that vase and watch last night’s Mad Men. [...] [...]

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Tuned In Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's Tuned In in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
JANE GOODALL, world famous primatologist, on a plan to breed monkeys for research in Puerto Rico

Stay Connected with TIME.com