A blog about television by TIME’s TV critic James Poniewozik.

Lazy TV Viewers to the Rescue!

Remember those DVRs that are supposed to be killing the TV business by letting people skip advertising? Turns out they're killing the TV business somewhat more softly than previously thought. Or maybe even helping it.

The ultimate outcome is still hazy, but the effects of DVR on TV have become more complicated because, as Bill Carter reports in the New York Times, it turns out that 46% of viewers 18 to 49 years old (the magic target for advertisers) are still watching the commercials in shows they record. The irresistible force that is technology has met the immovable object that is the slack-jawed American TV viewer, and they are fighting to a draw!

Now, I would bring a few caveats to Carter's piece. I'd have liked to see a little more clarity on the statistics, for one thing: e.g., are 46% of commercials being watched, or are 46% of people watching some commercials? (If I'm reading the piece wrong, please jump in and correct me.) And while the percentage of ads being watched may be surprising, that still leaves quite a percentage of ads not being watched—and the amount of time-shifting that's based on is only growing, with DVR usership up to a third of households.

That said, if the assumption heretofore has been that DVR viewing essentially doesn't count, ad-wise (an idea the networks, who are probably glad to see this article, have been fighting), then that could change. The question is the net effect the DVR has on the viewership and effectiveness of ads. If the DVR gets more people to skip ads, but results in people watching more TV than they used to, its effects could be a wash, which would delight networks trying to sell ads. Especially if they can get advertisers to pay for DVR viewership within a week of airing (right now, as the article notes, they pay for only the first three, getting four DVR days free).

The upshot for now is that the total ratings for a show, including DVR viewing, do still matter. This helps shows with big DVR fanbases (like House and The Office). It could even save a marginal show like Heroes. And it is yet another piece of bad news for "DVR-proof" Jay Leno, whose show is indeed so DVR-proof that it gains practically no viewers (relatively speaking) from the delayed-viewing boost.

Whether or not this is fantastic news for TV networks or not, it is at least not more bad news, which they've had enough of lately. Meanwhile, America, just keep staring blankly from your couch in a semi-fugue state at those recorded commercials, and everything will be fine. And thanks for subsidizing my TV viewing as I skip the ads!

  • Print
  • Comment
Comments (6)
Post a Comment »
  • 1

    Ha! I'm one of those lazy viewers who doesn't always skip commercials. Since we got DVR a few months ago, we have LOVED being able to skip commercials (as well as pause and rewind live tv), but I'm surprised at how often we don't skip them - sometimes it IS laziness (aww, the remote control is all the way over THERE...you get it. no you get it....), other times we use the commercials as a time-out to get snacks or use the restroom or something, and just let them run while we're out of the room. Sometimes we just forget that we can ffwd them, and its almost time for the show to come back before it occurs to either of us that we didn't actually have to sit through all those ads. If ads were shorter and there were fewer of them (like 2 or 3 short commercials per break instead of freaking 7 or 8 long ones), we would probably watch them a lot more than we do, but they're obnoxious and long and there's SO MANY of them. Ugh. Commercials. Ugh. Although the one for Uncharted 2 where the girlfriend thought it was a movie, and the complaint dude filed it under Not An Issue was pretty funny...

  • 2

    I try to skip the commercials, but inevitably some slip through. I can tell you that when the volume of the commercial is noticeably louder than the volume of the program, I will do whatever it takes to find the remote and skip that commercial break. So basically if you are nice polite advertiser whose ad gets placed after an obnoxious loud one, you're getting skipped. Do not pass go and do not collect $200.

  • 3

    @tyrantking - yeah, our drive to skip commercials is often directly proportional to the volume and shrillness of the ad - excellent point.

  • 4

    [...] Time’s James Poniewozik: The upshot for now is that the total ratings for a show, including DVR viewing, do still [...]

  • 5

    Good news, since I just saw my first lower-third ad (not a promo) on Syfy yesterday during "V: The Final Battle"

  • 6

    We also will sometimes leave the ads on while going to the bathroom or getting a snack. If the show segues immediately into a movie trailer or a video game I am interested then, then I will keep watching.

    I guess it is quite possible that a large chunk of DVRers are people who don't mind commercials and are just recording to watch something later on. People in the media business tend to assume that viewers act the same way they do, but the truth is that people in the media business are generally out of touch with mainstream America.

Add Your Comment:

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Tuned In Daily E-mail

Get e-mail updates from TIME's Tuned In in your inbox and never miss a day.

Quotes of the Day »

Get & Share
DEBI HEISS, on Ohio's execution of 51-year-old Kenneth Biros; Heiss's sister Tami was a victim of Biros, and the family applauded as the time of death was announced. It was the nation's first execution by a single injection rather than the three-drug process